Posted in Leadership

3 Words That Make Delegation Clear

Check. Do. Report.

You might hear a sentence like this spoken at the place I work:

Supervisor to assistant: “This is a ‘Do – Report’ task. Please reach out to the senior leaders for their input from our calendaring meeting, and then report back to me with a summary of their comments.”

“Check – Do – Report” is called the Delegation Triangle model in a leadership training course we require of all staff at our church, called Model-Netics. I’ve blogged previously on the what and why of this course for us. This simple delegation language is known by our employees.

Do items: Full discretion to complete task

Do – Report items: Full authority to do task, but report back when complete

Check – Do – Report items: Check with supervisor first for instructions and authority; do the work; report back

Early on in a delegation relationship, many delegated tasks will be “Check – Do – Report.” Over time, as trust and competence increases, delegation of many tasks moves to “Do – Report,” and finally, “Do.”

check do report

When it’s taught in Model-Netics, this principle is demonstrated by a triangle (pictured). Overtime, the supervisor wants to flip the triangle so only 20% of the delegated tasks are in the “Check – Do – Report” compartment, and the majority of tasks are in the “Do” compartment.

“A common language sets clear expectations for the delegate”

Some delegated tasks will always require checking in before launching, doing, and then reporting back to you. But a common language sets clear expectations for the delegate. In contrast, when I tell someone this is a “Do” task, it communicates authority and trust for them to complete the task, and only put me in the loop if something goes awry.

Practical Takeaways:

  1. Trial this with the person you delegate to most often;
  2. Explain the concept and meaning behind words;
  3. And try it out for a few weeks.

Like me, you’ll likely find that these three simple words communicate a lot and lessen the need for delegation follow-up.

 

Continue Reading

Understanding Your Team's Language

Seven years into my marriage, my wife and I realized we were having problems forming apologies to each other. I apologized to her the way I wanted her to apologize to me… “I’m sorry. I’m going to take XYZ steps to ensure it doesn’t happen again.”

But she wanted something different. She wanted me to own it, by recognizing the hurt I caused her. Until we read The Five Languages of Apology, we didn’t know we were apologizing to each other in what basically, foreign languages.

It was important for us and our marriage, to learn each other’s language – and I’ve learned that it’s important in my work-life, too.

Typically when you interact with people, it’s wise to follow the Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you wish done unto you.”

I’ve memorized it. I’ve had my kids memorize it. But in a work setting, the wisdom of the Golden Rule doesn’t hold up that well in all circumstances. It’s not always wise to manage others the same way you would want to be managed.

Often while at work, we encourage, correct, and lead in ways we wish to receive those same things. But each employee has different needs. The “Golden Rule breaking” idea comes from the book First, Break All the Rules. Authors Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman explain this idea and call it “managing by exception.”

Managing by exception is hard work. It takes study and a lot of relational intelligence (read past post on emotional and relational intelligence). Our church uses a personality and spiritual gifts assessment called PLACE to help better understand people’s personalities and give their supervisors tips how to lead them. Because this idea is so important, I also personally use StrengthsFinder, Stand Out and The Five Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace to better understand how people I work directly with like to receive communication, correction, and appreciation.

If it seems overwhelming to learn the “languages” of those who work directly with you, start small:

  • Ask them their favorite way to learn.
  • Ask if they prefer to talk things through in person or through email.
  • Ask if they like public recognition or something less “public.”
  • Determine if they like to make decisions alone or collaboratively.

As a leader, we have to communicate effectively to those we supervise. Effective communication will sound different to each person. When you can, contextualize to the individual.

Practical takeaway: at times, you’ll need to break the Golden Rule.

Continue Reading

6 posts with "practical takeaways" for church leaders

I’ve now been blogging for six months. While I hope most of my posts provide “practical takeaways for church leaders,” some are more conducive to action than others. I’ve also learned from readers what posts have allowed for immediate application in church leadership.

In no particular order here are six posts with practical takeaways:

  1. Church Crisis and The Media http://bbapt.us/1k5XI9K
  2. Staff Succession Planning (interview with Josh Patterson of The Village Church) http://bbapt.us/1dqJa2P
  3. How to Visit Churches to Worship and Not Compare http://bbapt.us/Hy3SDf
  4. Meetings: Being Prepared But Saying The Least http://bbapt.us/1cJyAUV
  5. Effectively Encouraging Those Around You http://bbapt.us/1c6kZ9r
  6. Dealing With Employees Who Are Late to Work and Meetings http://bbapt.us/19BR5fV
Continue Reading