Tag Archive: feedback

A Better Question In a Performance Review

 

Do you want to know how your team really feels about their job? Your church? Or perhaps even how they feel about you as a supervisor?

Knowing how your team “really” feels is critical to for your supervision, their development, and the success of your team (church).

If you want to know the right answers, you have to ask the right questions. Even in a good performance management system, the important questions can get lost among all the other small ones.  How your team members really feel is what I’ll refer to as the last 2% (that term is not unique to me and I’ve blogged previously on the “last 2%” concept). The last 2% is what you want to make sure you communicate (or have communicated to you) in your staff reviews.

I’ve found one question gets me the most helpful and transparent information from those I lead. It’s simple, has two-parts, and has begun some very informative conversations in review meetings I’ve had with staff (sometimes in writing, other times verbally):

  • What is it I’m doing as your supervisor that’s helping you complete the goals we’ve set for you and in your day-to-day job activities?
  • What is it I’m doing as your supervisor that’s hindering you from reaching all your goals and can get in the way of you doing day-to-day job activities?

3 Rules of Engagement when asking this question:

  1. Listen to their feedback. Don’t defend.
  2. Ask clarifying questions.

In any scenario where you’re trying to elicit a response, frame your questions in such way that assumes the person has feedback. It’s the difference between:

“What feedback do you have for me?” and, “Do you have any feedback for me?”

If you assume there‘s feedback, you’re more likely to get feedback.

  1. Be trustworthy.

Even if you ask the right question and they provide you honest (last 2%) feedback, it’s only good for one try – unless you listen to their feedback and affect change based on it (or at least explain why you may not). You can’t hold their input over them (especially if it’s negative).

If you listen and don’t punish people for their feedback, they’ll be more likely to give it to you in the future.

I encourage you to try this out at your next review meeting. I believe you’ll be a better supervisor because of it.

P.S. I believe the two-part question fits nicely into a performance management system with formal reviews, but it can still work in informal settings with those you lead.

Continue Reading

The Hardest Thing A Leader Says…The Last 2%

This is post two of four on church staff values. You can get context from my first post, here: Information Sharing.

 “Your work is not meeting expectations and must improve for you to continue working here.”

“The way you are treating me and others on the staff is unacceptable.”

“When you come to meetings late and unprepared, it reflects poorly on you, your ministry, and me as a leader.”

“As I reviewed your receipts from the most recent conference you attended, I saw some expenditures that caused me concern, and I want to discuss them further with you.”

These are “last 2%” statements. Last 2% statements are the most important things we need to say in a conversation in order to make it effective – but often, they never get said.

We talk around them. We say the other 98% which hints at them. But when the meeting is over, we find we never said clearly that one thing we really needed the other person to hear. And when that happens, the behavior or issue in question will continue on.

If your staff can develop a last 2% culture, you can get to the crux of matters. But that means you have to do these things first…

…Say goodbye to passive-aggressive behavior.

…Say goodbye to ambiguity in conversations.

…Say goodbye to indirect supervision that doesn’t lead to change behavior.

Having a last 2% staff culture doesn’t give permission to constantly lower the boom on people. It doesn’t ignore what you know about their personality and how they receive information best. It just means that what you have to say is important, and they need to hear it clearly.

Here are some takeaways, about how to have a successful “last 2%” conversation.

The last 2% …

…Must be the clearest statement you make in the conversation.

Think through your statement(s). People are only going to remember a few phrases from these conversations (maybe less if it’s really stressful), so make sure you have a simple and clear message.

…Is seasoned with grace.

If the last 2% comes out of a healthy relationship, it shouldn’t rock anyone’s world. It may not be pleasant, but it’s not a relationship killer. Saying hard things can be done gracefully. Jesus and Paul did it often.

…Invites accountability, and requires a follow-up plan.

A good last 2% delivery lets them know the issue and also what needs to be done in response. Just as your 2% statement should be free of ambiguity, so should your plan of action and expectation. It should be followed with a timeline and a plan for follow-up accountability.

…Is a statement you’re committed to.

You don’t want to say the hard thing unless you’re convinced it’s the right thing to say. You only have so much relationship and leader capital, and you have to use it when it’s right. You also have to show commitment to delivery. Once you get into a conversation and they share an excuse, cry, or some other distraction occurs, it’s easy for them to walk out of the office without you ever saying the last 2%. Write it down and know that you have to get your last 2% across, no matter what.

Excellent leaders can deliver thoughtful last 2% statements as needed.

Excellent Christian leaders can deliver thoughtful, prayed about, grace-based last 2% statements as needed.

I’ve found that a last 2% culture allows church staffs to do effective Kingdom work, even more efficiently.

Note: The last 2% concept is not original with me. I believe I heard it first as Willow Creek conference. And I’ve also heard it referred to as the last “10%.”
Continue Reading